Coerced debt outcomes
We know that many victim-survivors are too scared to report the abuser to the police and for those who do criminal justice outcomes are poor.* Even if a victim-survivor manages to secure a criminal justice outcome, it does not address the devastating impact of coerced debt. Therefore, often the only way a victim-survivor can achieve a just outcome is to have the coerced debts written off by their lender, either in part or in full.
As we have stated previously, we do not believe a victim-survivor should have to repay debts that have been accrued through coercion, but decisions about write-off are at a lender’s discretion and based on a number of factors.
In our ‘Too close to home’ report, we described the experience of one of our debt advice clients, Anita*, who told us how life-changing it was to have half of her £52,000 worth of coerced debts written off.
Fig. 8: Responses to whether they had debts written off or tried to get debts written off
| |
At least one debt written off in part or full |
Have not tried getting any debts written off |
| Total |
28% |
55% |
| Male |
45% |
39% |
| Female |
11% |
74% |
| Additional vulnerability |
17% |
67% |
As this chart shows, the majority of victim-survivors did not try to get their debts written off, and this was significantly higher among women and those with additional vulnerabilities, which paints a worrying picture for outcomes for these groups.
This data also indicates that most people with coerced debts are repaying, and other data from our survey suggests that this often causes financial hardship. Based on the data on credit information, people may be repaying because they are worried about the impact of not doing so on their credit score, or because they aren’t aware of what help is available to them.
If some people are having their debts written off in part, this suggests they may be accessing conventional forbearance like reduced payments.